For industrial facility owners, the business case for onsite renewable energy is clear: reduced OpEx and carbon footprint. However, the physical reality is often less straightforward. Most manufacturing plants operate on a factory electrical installation that was commissioned decades ago, designed for a linear, one-way power flow. Introducing a high-capacity solar generation asset into this legacy environment creates a complex “brownfield” challenge that, if mismanaged, introduces significant operational risks.
The Hidden Threat in Brownfield Projects
Integrating modern power electronics with aging infrastructure is rarely a simple plug-and-play task. Old switchgear and transformers face new thermal stresses when connected to a solar array. The bi-directional flow of energy can cause voltage swells that older protective devices were never engineered to handle. This incompatibility is a leading cause of project delays and post-commissioning failures.
What Are the Specific Risks of Aging Grids?
Before any EPC contract is signed, a rigorous risk assessment must pinpoint vulnerabilities. Without a detailed audit, the integration process exposes the facility to several critical hazards:
- Thermal Overload: Existing busbars and cables may degrade rapidly under the continuous load profile of solar generation.
- Short Circuit Ratings: Adding a generator increases the potential fault current, often exceeding the breaking capacity of old breakers.
- Protection Coordination: Legacy relays may not distinguish between grid faults and solar fluctuations, leading to nuisance tripping.
- Arc Flash Hazards: Higher fault currents can dangerously increase incident energy levels, requiring updated safety protocols.
EPC Due Diligence: The Technical Audit
A bankable Solar EPC partner starts with the single-line diagram (SLD) of the facility. Advanced utility scale solar projects require a comprehensive “Grid Impact Study” performed by the engineering team. This study models the interaction between the proposed inverters and the plant’s existing impedance. It identifies exactly which components are past their useful life and must be replaced to ensure the new asset is safe.
Upgrading for Liability and Longevity
Often, the audit reveals that the existing factory electrical installation is the bottleneck. While replacing a main distribution board represents an added CapEx, it is a necessary intervention. Leaving a 30-year-old switchgear to manage a 25-year solar investment is a financial risk that is hard to justify. A targeted upgrade resets the lifecycle of the electrical backbone, ensuring it matches the longevity of the new solar plant.
Managing Power Quality and Harmonics
Older transformers are susceptible to the harmonic currents generated by inverters. If not filtered, these harmonics cause overheating and insulation failure. A competent EPC provider mitigates this by specifying active harmonic filters as part of the core scope. This level of technical foresight prevents “silent” damage that would otherwise lead to catastrophic equipment failure.
